If you collect (I do) or just enjoy looking at goofy vintage trash mags from the 60's, then you'll enjoy perusing Bad Mags. During the 60's, underground publishers cranked out a variety of weird, sleazy and sensational magazines in a variety of bizarre subject matter. Bad Mags is a unique and informative online guide to a hugely popular, now neglected, aspect of US literary history. There's some light nudity and exploitive subject matter, so use discretion when viewing the site at work.





Of course I love all these magazines, but wonder if this is not a conflict of interest, as I believe you or your alter ego has appeared in virtually all of them!!
Xoxo
L
Posted by: Chaos by Design | November 12, 2008 at 11:18 AM
ooooh, thanks for the link, 14!
I absolutely adore this stuff...they're all so perfectly awesome, I can't even pick a favorite.
it's funny that You should post this, because I just got into artistic modeling...and it has long been a dream of mine to do a vintage pin-up style shoot and use the photos to design an old-timey trash mag cover like one of these.
Posted by: Maggie | November 13, 2008 at 06:40 PM
Bad Mags is righteous. Funny to see what my parents' generation found lascivious. Of the four women you chose, the two with beehive are notable mostly for their hair. Ms. Edgington though is quite alluring indeed. (BTW I read somewhere that a thin waist is the only aspect of feminine beauty that's been constant across cultures and through time.) Alas, Ms. Busty would not make the porn cut now that stick-thin women can have breasts as big as they please. I am ashamed at my cruelty, but I wonder if someone to the right of Busty's photographer was arousing her with a meatball sub.
--Karl
Posted by: Glorious Karl | November 15, 2008 at 04:42 PM
I believe a zaftig girl like Miss Busty would still enjoy some degree of success,in more niche,or to use the pornographer's argot,more "specialist" publications.
The makers of "Big And Natural Fifteen" would probably snap her up in an instant,although they would require a bit more of her than dolefully gazing at an off camera sandwich.
Posted by: Liberal Communist Pig | November 18, 2008 at 05:55 AM
A small critique of my last comment:
In it I made a reference to "specialist" publications.
Publications?
So what would that medium be described as then?
Analog Porn?
Excuse me for any typing errors in this post,since the Viewing Screen for my Differential Calculating Engine is fading and I need to fill it with coal if I want to send out my E-mails by the days end.
Posted by: Liberal Communist Pig | November 18, 2008 at 06:27 AM
oh, wow! this stuff is awesome! it's so disconnected that it's interesting.
Posted by: javelin | February 03, 2009 at 06:54 PM